Islamic school’s gender segregation is unlawful, court of appeal rules

CREDIT: This story was first seen in The Guardian

Judges overturn earlier ruling that segregation at al-Hijrah school in Birmingham is not sex discrimination, The Guardian reports.

An Islamic faith school’s policy of segregating boys from girls is unlawful sex discrimination, court of appeal judges have ruled.

The three judges in London overturned last year’s finding by a high court judgethat Ofsted inspectors were wrong to penalise the mixed-sex al-Hijrah school in Birmingham on the basis of an “erroneous” view that segregation amounted to unlawful discrimination.

In a test case ruling on Friday, the master of the rolls, Sir Terence Etherton, Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Beatson unanimously allowed a challenge by Ofsted’s chief inspector, Amanda Spielman, against Mr Justice Jay’s decision.

The ruling will affect other schools that have a segregation policy.

The appeal judges held that the school’s policy of complete segregation from year 5 caused detriment and less favourable treatment for both male and female pupils by reason of their sex, and was contrary to the 2010 Equality Act.

For religious reasons the voluntary-aided school, which has pupils aged between four and 16, believes that separation of the sexes from year 5 onwards is obligatory.

It has complete segregation of boys and girls from ages nine to 16 for all lessons, breaks, school clubs and trips.

Spielman said she was delighted that the watchdog had won its appeal.

“Ofsted’s job is to make sure that all schools properly prepare children for life in modern Britain. Educational institutions should never treat pupils less favourably because of their sex, or for any other reason,” she said.

“The school is teaching boys and girls entirely separately, making them walk down separate corridors, and keeping them apart at all times. This is discrimination and is wrong. It places these boys and girls at a disadvantage for life beyond the classroom and the workplace, and fails to prepare them for life in modern Britain.

You might also like...  MPs attack ejection of 'underperforming' sixth-formers

“This case involves issues of real public interest, and has significant implications for gender equality, Ofsted, government, and the wider education sector. We will be considering the ruling carefully to understand how this will affect future inspections.”

Rebecca Hilsenrath, the chief executive of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said: “Regardless of their gender, every child has the right to an effective education – and one which lets them be themselves and mix with whoever they choose. For this reason, we welcome today’s confirmation by the court of appeal that it is unlawful for a mixed school to segregate girls and boys completely.

“Socialisation is a core part of a good quality education, just as much as formal learning, and without it we’re harming children’s life chances right from the start.
The government’s recent race disparity audit highlighted clear attainment gaps and it is important that in addressing those gaps our schools operate in ways that reflect and reinforce the country’s values of fair treatment and respect.”

Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, or connect with us on LinkedIn!