As reported by the BBC, schools and councils are having to find money from their own budgets to implement the mayor of London’s pledge to provide free school meals to all primary school pupils from September
Sadiq Khan has promised £135m to extend free meals for a year.
But schools are worried it could lead to the loss of pupil premium funding and it does not cover the full costs.
Mr Khan said he recently made more money available and was working to ensure pupil premium income went up.
At the moment the government pays for free school meals for all four to six-year-olds at Key Stage 1 and the eligible seven to 11-year-olds at Key Stage 2.
London’s mayor said that extending it to another 270,000 seven to 11-year-olds will save families £440 at a time of cost-of-living pressures.
But his fund does not cover capital costs so schools cannot access money for new equipment, kitchen improvements or extra staff.
Schools are being given £2.65 per meal, but some are in catering contracts where they are being charged more than that — so will have to make up the shortfall for every new pupil signing up.
The mayor’s use of Greater London Authority reserves for a one-year handout is a signature policy ahead of next year’s mayoral election.
But it has run up against practical difficulties.
Labour-run Lewisham Council stepped in with £650,000 for items including new ovens, fridges and other kitchen improvements.
But it said it could not meet the estimated shortfall between what schools were charging and what they were getting from the mayor.
Lewisham’s cabinet member for finance Amanda De Ryk said: “It’s a brilliant scheme in principle. In practice there are some costs that have come down to the local authority.
“We have had to put a significant amount of money into improving schools’ kitchens. But it’s the right thing to do.”
Dr Increase Eko, head teacher of Adamsrill Primary School in south-east London, said it was important for all children to have at least one hot meal a day but there were questions about the scheme.
“It’s good in theory but has a lot of challenges,” Dr Eko said. “Schools are struggling with their funding.
“I and other head teachers weren’t asked whether it was what we needed at this time.”
Her school has a recently modernised kitchen but she needs more storage space, fridges, plates and cutlery.
“We are only just managing to cope,” she said. “I can’t imagine what older Victorian schools are dealing with.”
The biggest concern is the effect on pupil premium funding which is determined by how many disadvantaged children they teach.
They fear if eligible families now get free school meals automatically, they won’t register or “apply” for them, thereby reducing the money schools get.
Adamsrill Primary School receives nearly £200,000 a year from the pupil premium.
“If parents don’t apply because they think their child now has free school meals, the school isn’t going to get a significant amount of money,” said Dr Eko.
Hackney’s Labour mayor Phillip Glanville said he welcomed the money from City Hall as a “game-changer in the national political debate” but it was for one year only and there would be uncertainty after that.
In Hackney at least seven primary schools out of more than 30 currently charge more than £2.65 per meal.
Mr Glanville said the council would meet any shortfall this year but it could not afford to take over the £2.8m overall cost when the City Hall funding ends.
“There’s a lot of pressure on our school budgets,” he said. “We have a huge SEND (special educational needs and disability) deficit. We are seeing a fall in pupil numbers. Finding that money from our budgets is incredibly hard.”
This week Hackney launched “Tackling Food Poverty in Education”, a report recommending universal free school meals of high quality, which use more nutritious ingredients locally sourced and delivered in house where possible, rather than being supplied by big catering contractors.
Be the first to comment