As reported by BBC News, Ofqual fines NCFE £300,000 over major issues with health and science T-level exams impacting students’ futures
Ofqual said it had had to take “unprecedented” action against the exam board, NCFE, to get 1,200 students’ results recalculated.
One of the 700 students whose grades were amended as a result told BBC News her T-level had been a “wasted two years”.
NCFE chief executive David Gallagher said the board had apologised to students, providers and parents and taken steps to avoid it happening again.
The exam board used to be known as the Northern Council for Further Education but now operates nationally as NCFE.
T-levels were introduced by the Conservative government, in 2020, as a vocational option for students in England to take after their GCSEs.
Each course lasts two years and is roughly equivalent to three A-levels.
Labour did not mention T-levels specifically in its election manifesto but did say it would work on a strategy for post-16 education to address a “widespread” skills shortage.
Ofqual said NCFE had failed to develop “valid question papers” for its T-level qualifications in healthcare, healthcare science, and science.
A petition to change the results, launched in August 2022, before the papers were regraded, reached 1,200 signatures.
One of those who signed the petition, Grace Darnbrough, now 18, from Rochdale, feels her cohort of healthcare T-level students were “like guinea pigs”, being tested on a course that “wasn’t ready to be ran”.
She remembers her heart sinking and feeling “blindsided” during her science exam, which included questions that had “nothing to do with” what she had been taught about.
Ms Darnbrough had hoped to take a paramedic course at university but was not accepted, which she feels is in part because of the grading issues.
“It’s impacted my future,” she says.
“They said [T-levels] were going to be the new BTec – they were going to be the same, if not better – it was going to be this amazing thing.
“And unfortunately, it didn’t live up to its standard. I wouldn’t recommend it to anybody.
“I wasted two years of my career.”
‘Need compensating’
Ms Darnbrough has since left college and started an emergency-medical-technician apprenticeship, which she says is better equipping her with the skills she needs.
She welcomed the NCFE being fined but said: “That’s not going to change our future [or] take us back to where we deserve to be.
“If that course was run well, I would have been able to save a year and be into the career I want to be in – and I’ve been unable to do that.
“I think we do need compensating, because they’ve wasted our time.”
The number of students taking T-levels has increased each year since they started, and there were 16,085 entrants in the 2023-24 academic year.
As well as classroom learning, the courses – covering practical, rather than academic, subjects such as construction, agriculture, education and engineering – involve an occupational specialism and a work placement.
Students have to achieve at least a grade E in their core component, a pass in their occupational specialism and meet the industry placement requirements.
As part of the rollout, the Conservative government had been withdrawing funding for other post-16 courses, such as BTecs, which were deemed to “overlap” with the new T-level programmes.
However, issues such as low take-up of T-levels, a lack of awareness of the qualification among employers and overly complex assessments have led to calls for the new Labour government to pause and review that process.
Critics have also pointed to high dropout rates among the T-level cohort who completed their courses last summer.
Figures showed only 66% of T-level students completed their course in 2023.
The A-level retention rate, by comparison, was 95%, while for vocational alternatives such as applied general qualifications, it was 92%.
And some in the further-education sector say the problems with the health and science exams, sat by a large portion of that same T-level cohort in their first year of study, could be partly behind the high dropout rate last year.
Be the first to comment