Ofsted reforms needed for better school evaluation

Hand putting virtual quality assurance and arrow which print screen on wooden cube for quality enhancement of  guarantee product and ISO service concept.

As reported by Institute for Government, with new chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver taking charge amid criticism, a report advocates careful reforms, emphasising improved training for inspectors, refined criteria for intervention, and an enhanced inspection framework

The new chief Inspector Sir Martyn Oliver starts his five-year term – on 1 January – at a time when Ofsted is under heavy fire. Inspections are valued by parents and many school leaders but are used in too blunt a way by the Department for Education to fire headteachers.

The report finds that large cuts in Ofsted’s funding made by the Department for Education have put the quality of inspections at risk, even though ministers are more reliant than ever on these judgments to make decisions about firing headteachers.

Arguing against a pause in inspections, as called for by headteacher unions following the inquest in headteacher Ruth Perry’s death, and warning that a radical overhaul of schools regulation could cause damage to education outcomes in the long-term, Sam Freedman sets out how to improve the existing system in a way that would ensure it worked better for school leaders, while not sacrificing the interests of young people or their parents. Reforms also need to take into account the wider work Ofsted does – the majority of Ofsted’s funding is not for schools related work – and the potential knock-on consequences for regulators in other sectors like health and policing.

The report’s recommendations include:

  • Ofsted moving as quickly as possible to provide a comprehensive response to the concerns highlighted in the Ruth Perry inquest, providing further resources for training for inspectors and support for school leaders.
  • The DfE immediately stopping intervention based on two “requires improvement” (RI) judgments, as removing this “cliff edge” would reduce stress on teachers and hostility to Ofsted.
  • The DfE providing much more detailed criteria for intervention – for example if a safeguarding failure can be fixed quickly by the existing leadership team then no intervention would be required.
  • The DfE funding Ofsted to commission independent studies on the reliability of inspections, as this could build trust in the sector and improve the quality of inspections and training.
  • Retaining the existing inspection framework as it has reduced unfair disparities between schools with very different demographics and building on this by providing more contextual information about schools.
Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter like us on Facebook or connect with us on LinkedIn!

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply