CREDIT: This story was first seen in the Guardian
Grammar school headteachers are threatening to seek monthly donations from parents to cover government budget cuts, joining the chorus of protests over the emerging funding crisis, the Guardian reports.
The government’s plans for a revised “fair funding” formula would mean most grammar schools were worse off as a result of the changes proposed by the education secretary, Justine Greening – at a time when the government is banking on grammar school expansion as a key domestic policy aim.
The Grammar School Heads’ Association said more than 100 of the existing 163 grammar schools in England would be worse off as a result of the proposals, with more than 60 suffering deep cuts in annual budgets.
While some grammar schools already ask parents for regular donations, Tim Gartside, the headteacher of Altrincham Grammar School for Boys in Trafford, said his school was considering asking parents for donations of £30 to £40 a month if the new formula goes ahead.
“What we’re looking at here is funding which is fundamentally going to change the nature of grammar schools,” Gartside told the BBC. He added that “many other” grammar schools were doing the same.
The new “fair funding” formula unveiled by Greening at the end of last year would impose cuts on schools in mainly urban and suburban areas, and redistribute funding to more rural regions that have received considerably lower per pupil funding for many years.
However, the policy failed to inject any new funds into the school system, meaning that thousands of schools in England with frozen budgets will be further disadvantaged.
Angela Rayner, Labour’s education spokeswoman, said 98% of schools in England were already being hit by rising costs, increasing pupil numbers and government underfunding.
“The tragedy is that most of those schools, unlike grammars, don’t have parents who can afford to stump up an extra £500 to £600 a year to pay for another teacher or new books and equipment,” Rayner said.
“The government’s funding formula is a botched job – when rising costs and pupil numbers are taken into account most schools will actually be worse off. The government needs a fundamental rethink of its proposals so that all our children can get the best education possible.”
The Department for Education responded by saying spending on schools is nominally at the highest level on record, worth more than £40bn in 2016-17.
“The government has protected the core schools budget in real terms since 2010, but the system for distributing that funding across the country is unfair, opaque and outdated,” a DfE spokesperson said.
“It is based on patchy and inconsistent decisions that have built up over many years and on data that is over a decade old. We are going to end the historic post code lottery in school funding.”
Public consultation on the new funding formula runs until March 22, with school leaders and some Conservative MPs hoping for changes as a result.
This week the National Association of Head Teachers said its members had reported an increasing number of schools forced into annual deficits, with a majority saying they were making cuts or spending reserves to cope.
But grammar schools, which select by academic ability at the age of 11, are worse off than many state schools because of their failure to admit disadvantaged pupils eligible for additional government funding of more than £900 each a year.
Altrincham Grammar School for Boys has just 26 students receiving pupil premium funding out of 1,250 students enrolled, or just two per cent overall.
Schools in England are not allowed to charge pupils for teaching, attending or applying to join a school. But they are allowed to approach parents for donations and to charge for additional activities such as trips.
Parents of pupils at Latymer school, a grammar school in north London, were told last year that a “very significant financial shortfall” could force it to cut staff, increase class sizes and offer fewer subjects at GCSE and A-level.
A letter from the school’s headteacher and governors asked for donations of £30 to £50 a month, and told parents such contributions were “considerably less than the average fees of an independent school”.